I apologise for today’s almost non-existent blogging. If there are any of you out there for whom my blog is equivalent to crack cocaine, I apologise, but will state: think yourself lucky - it’s safer. I have cut back blogging for a few days because it’s going to be a busy few days: I’ve got presubmitted essays to work on, lecturers to see, research to be done, a few official duties to be carried out, and all that jazz. This is combined with the fact that my parents are off to Moscow for a few days. Tommorow’s going to be a light blogging day also.
Is anyone surprised that teens aren’t using RSS. Teens are people. Many people are stupid. Thus many teens are stupid. Blogs: MySpace for people with brains. RSS: newspapers for people with lives to live.
Saturday’s march seems to have riled up exactly the people it should be riling up - censoriuous dhimwits. For example, claiming that he is somehow similar to Nick Griffin because he shares an opinion with them. Sorry, but as much as I despise Mr. Griffin and his party, that doesn’t change the fact that if he says something, it doesn’t automatically become wrong as a result. If Mr Griffin said “2 + 2 = 5”, then it would be wrong. If he said “2 + 2 = 4”, it would be right. His racist opinions don’t change this fact. If his, and Risdon’s, criticisms of Islam are justifiable and reasonable, then the fact that the latter’s opinion is similar to the former’s does not change the validity of the opinion. To suggest so is the ultimate in mental incompetence.
Ophelia has a good post on Saturday’s march.
Somebody Googled for “writely bibtex” and found me. We need BibTeX support in the AJAX services. We need a AJAX-LaTeX (perhaps LaTajaXWrite!).
We need an MP3 of this debate, so bad. I mean, come on!
Mike Arrington has visited the CoComment guys.
Crazy stuff, folks. I never knew that politicians had riders. They’re certainly far less exciting than riders from real stars like Ozzy, Mariah and Skynyrd (they love their watermelon!).
Oh, my
Calladus, over at PZ’s place, said this:
In physics class a few years ago we were exploring friction and used Britney as a model. We learned that Britney couldn’t generate enough force to actually push a soda machine across the floor, but that she certainly could generate the necessary force to tip the machine over on top of herself.
When ever I see Britney in the news now, I see the blackboard equations, and graphic of a squashed Britney.
In physics class a few years ago we were exploring friction and used Britney as a model. We learned that Britney couldn’t generate enough force to actually push a soda machine across the floor, but that she certainly could generate the necessary force to tip the machine over on top of herself.
When ever I see Britney in the news now, I see the blackboard equations, and graphic of a squashed Britney.
That’s so beautiful.
Geoff Jones has a write up of Technology 2.0 last week.
Noodly stuff, and bitter creationists. That’s today’s Panda’s Thumb. “;->”
Peter likes Jason Garfield’s routine. I think it kicks ass. Nice pun on the balls, Peter. I expect after the routine, he put those balls back in a sack.
iWeb is a memory pig. Is too.
Woo-hoo! We’re the moral ones, we’re the moral ones! Take that Mr Bush and your evangelical “values”.
Hummer Q&A: “Yes, as an H2 “Hummer” driver you’re entitled to shoot as many brown-skinned people and homosexuals as you want to”.
Academic podcasts ahoy. Biochemistry, Fundamentals of Biology, General Chemistry, Principles of Economics, Survey of Global History, Intro to International Relations, Intro to American Politics, The Question of Human Natures, the Washington College of Law class, Tools for the Information Age and Understanding Computers and the Internet all look interesting. Very cool. (via)
Damn it. I hate being on the train next to a snorer.
Jason Rosenhouse is right on Bunting’s yawny op-ed on Dembski, Dawkins, Dennett and Ruse.
Furedi on Plagiarism
Frank Furedi has an article on plagiarism and cheating in universities and schools.
His basic thesis is that parents have ‘institutionalised’ plagiarism and cheating. It’s a nice idea but I’m unconvinced.
The problem is that plagiarism comes about, in my experience, from a lack of skills. I’ve actually had difficulty finding source material to read for essays. I can’t find essays to plagiarise because the material isn’t there! That’s after Googling, checking both the academic libraries I use, and often the British Library also.
Would I plagiarise if I could? No. It’s wrong to do so. Could I plagiarise if I wanted to? Occasionally, but it wouldn’t actually answer the question set.
Schools do not teach critical reading skills, academic essay writing, footnoting and bibliography writing. All of these are necessary for university - and all are skills (not particularly difficult) I have taught myself because nobody else wanted to.
The government currently uses the Key Skills Qualification as remedial education for 16-18 year olds to make up for the failures of their GCSE educations. The government are playing a game where they say that vocational qualifications are equivalent to academic qualifications.
The point that Furedi makes about parents being outsourced teachers is interesting. “Outsourcing” is the word I would use, but I would switch the direction. We’ve been teaching our own for a long time, and often parents can do it a lot better than qualified teachers. And there are benefits (downsides also: raising them to be ideological and philosophical clones is hardly an advantage). We’ve outsourced our teaching to the government, and they’ve done a poor job handling the responsibility.
Every few years, the government change everything. I’m a year younger than the folks who got the full brunt of reform. My friend Dan got everything - the introduction of Sats, Key Stages (later Assessment Stages or some other newspeak), CATs (which are a bit like an IQ test merged with American style SAT exams), the introduction of National Records of Achievements (quickly rescinded in our area, then brought back in, causing numerous headaches as the students moved from primary to secondary school), fiddled with GNVQ’s and, finally, got the full meddlesome reform-for-the-sake-of-reform that was “Curriculum 2000” (turning A-levels in to AS/A2 levels, quadrupling the number of exams taken in the Sixth Form, introducing the ridiculously ill thought out Key Skills Qualification).
So, not only are today’s twenty-two years olds educational refugees in a land of constantly rebranded and relaunched acronyms, now they are finishing university only for their parents to find out their younger sibling is starting university with three times the financial burden.
What the government could do to fix the education system is to leave it alone for awhile. They’ve spent so long playing with it, rejigging it and pulling letters out of the Scrabble bag to name new qualifications, might it actually be time just to sit back and see whether or not it actually works?
All of these issues come from a government more interested in shouting out big new ideas than thinking of actual good ideas. How exactly does teaching mathematics suited to twelve year olds to seventeen year olds who’ve already passed their maths GCSEs benefit them?
Similarly, look at school libraries. They are chronically resource-less. Between 1996 and 2003, my old school library halved the number of books they had, and halved the quality (they had a whole shelf of celebrity picture books prominently displayed on my departure - hardly a “independent learning resources centre”).
On the bright side, all of this will be irrelevant in a few years. Academic overachievers will be shipped off to either America or some “fag” country like France where they care about poetry and philosophy. The rest will sit back and enjoy the vomit running through the streets. I’m saving up for my plane ticket… “;->”
